Ok, I've been a long-time believer that no good red wine could possible come from a place like Michigan. Unless you are into the super sweet fruit or berry wines that have more in common with pancake syrup than real wine, you're better off looking elsewhere, particularly when it comes to dry red wines. And after tonight's selection, I can definitively confirm, I was right!
I bought a bottle of Tabor Hill Red Arrow Red, named for the famed "Red Arrow Highway" in southwest Michigan, on a lark as I was passing through Stevensville Michigan on the way home from Chicago. I found this "dry red table wine" on sale for only $7, which is by far it's most redeeming quality. Having tried some other red blends from my more favored wineries in Washington, like the recent Helix Pomatia from Reininger, or the classic L'Ecole Columbia Valley Red Wine that are such spectacular house reds for not that much more than this wine, the Red Arrow Red was just a disappointment.
The color of the wine was a translucent red, similar to cranberry juice, or perhaps cherry Kool-Aid, but nothing that would suggest a hearty dry red wine blend. The label claims that it's a blend of Cabernet Franc, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot, but I just don't see it, as it simply has the appearance of a rose gone wrong. The nose is somewhat medicine like, with a scent of wet cardboard, and maybe a hint of fruit. The taste is certainly dry, there is no hint of boysenberry syrup here, but there was little flavor at all, outside some hints of leather and a bit of oak. There was virtually no finish, which is actually a plus, since if I had to endure a long finish of this set of flavors I would have dumped this much earlier in the evening.
Thankfully, I had a descent dinner to enjoy this evening, so I didn't even notice the wine (though it saddens me how much better my dinner could have been with a descent bottle!). In fact, as I was eating my porterhouse with grilled sweet corn and green beans, I thought how much this wine was like simply drinking water with my meal! Of course I also thought how much better this wine would be on my salad in a few months after turning to vinegar, which is why I seriously thought about rating this under 4, but alas, I'll relent for the hometown producers and give this one a generous 4.5...ugh.
Showing posts with label Meh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Meh. Show all posts
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Saturday, April 14, 2012
2006 Sola Napa Valley Zinfandel
Tonight I've decided to open a bottle of Sola Napa Valley Zinfandel, and I'll admit I was not impressed. Granted, I am not sure anyone has any business producing Zin in Napa Valley, since everyone knows the best come from Lodi anyway (insert shocked emoticon here), so this one just reinforces my prejudice against wines from Napa that are not Cabernet Sauvignon.
This wine struck me as a bit sketchy from the first pour, very light in color, suggesting not much body which is a problem for such a high alcohol wine. Initially, the nose was very pungent, with almost sour notes, but after it opened up a bit there were notes of leather, licorice and strawberry with some hints of oak or cedar. The taste is unremarkable, little more than fruit with alcohol blended in, some notes of sour cherry midpalate and poorly developed tannins for a finish that just say "meh..." The wine definitely needs time to open up, perhaps some serious time in the decanter (or maybe I'll try my aerator I got for Christmas), but even then there is little about this wine that impresses me.
As for pairings, tonight I'm having teriaki pork tenderloin with some couscous and steamed broccoli, but I'm still mulling opening up another bottle with my dinner, but we'll see. I would rate this wine a weak 6, and fortunately I don't think I paid a lot for this bottle otherwise I'd be really disappointed!
This wine struck me as a bit sketchy from the first pour, very light in color, suggesting not much body which is a problem for such a high alcohol wine. Initially, the nose was very pungent, with almost sour notes, but after it opened up a bit there were notes of leather, licorice and strawberry with some hints of oak or cedar. The taste is unremarkable, little more than fruit with alcohol blended in, some notes of sour cherry midpalate and poorly developed tannins for a finish that just say "meh..." The wine definitely needs time to open up, perhaps some serious time in the decanter (or maybe I'll try my aerator I got for Christmas), but even then there is little about this wine that impresses me.
As for pairings, tonight I'm having teriaki pork tenderloin with some couscous and steamed broccoli, but I'm still mulling opening up another bottle with my dinner, but we'll see. I would rate this wine a weak 6, and fortunately I don't think I paid a lot for this bottle otherwise I'd be really disappointed!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)